Monitor Manual Testers

Written by Muhammad Nabeel Rahim

Last updated 17 April 2026

The Manual Testing section of the People report focuses on tester participation and geographical distribution, offering insights into the tester contributions and regional representation.

 

Indicators about manual testers in the Testlio platform.

Indicator

What It Tracks

What Signals it Might Bring

Testers

The total number of testers that started at least one manual testing task during the period. Automatically compares with how many testers started a task during the prior period.

This metric tracks overall participation, signaling trends in tester engagement.

  • An increase may indicate increased testing needs.

  • A decline could highlight resource gaps or shifts in scope.

Avg. Tasks per Tester

The average number of manual testing tasks started by a person during the period. Automatically compares with the average number of manual testing tasks started in the prior period.

 

To be included, tasks need to be started within the period but don't need to have been completed within the period.

This metric offers insights into workload distribution and productivity.

  • A higher average may suggest efficient task distribution or increased workload.

  • A lower average could point to under-utilization or opportunities to improve engagement.

Tasks

The total number of manual testing tasks started during the period. Automatically compares with the total for the prior period.

 

To be included, tasks need to be started within the period but don't need to have been completed within the period.

This metric offers a measure of overall manual testing activity volume.

  • An increase may indicate expanded scope or heightened activity.

  • A decrease could signal reduced workload or a need to reevaluate task complexity.

Tester Countries

The number of countries with at least one tester during the period. Automatically compares with the number of countries during the prior period.

This metric reflects geographical coverage.

  • More countries, representing a broad testing spread, may be beneficial for localization testing.

  • Fewer countries, representing concentrated coverage, could indicate reliance on specific regions.

Tester Regions

The number of world regions with at least one tester during the period. Automatically compares with the total during the prior period.

This metric reflects broader geographical coverage than countries.

Average Testers per Country

The average number of testers in each country. Automatically compares with the average during the prior period.

This metric offers insight into regional distribution and tester density. It also signals regional distribution balance. 

  • Uneven densities may point to opportunities for optimizing geographical reach or reallocating resources.

This indicator is also great for identifying localization needs and ensuring resources are allocated as needed.

World Map & Testers by Country

The geographical distribution of testers, displayed on a world map, with larger circles representing more testers in the given country. The same data is given in the list Testers by country.

These indicators highlight tester concentrations, aiding decisions on balancing geographical representation and identifying areas to expand tester networks.

Issues by Tester

Data on issues reported by each tester: the number reported, approval rate, fixed rates, and distribution by severity level (high, medium, low).

This indicator highlights individual contributions to issue discovery and resolution.

  • Many reported issues with balanced approval and fixing rates indicate effective testing.

  • Disparities in rates could be a signal of training or strategy gaps.

Tests Executed by Tester

The number of tests completed by each tester. 

This indicator provides insights into tester productivity and focus.

  • High activity may highlight key contributors.

  • Uneven contributions could point to the need for workload adjustments or scope evaluation.

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article